I’ve been using Phidata and value its straightforward approach to agent development. I’d like to propose an enhancement that could significantly improve developer experience and position Phidata as the leading agent framework.
The Vision
Consider Streamlit’s impact on data application development. Before Streamlit, building a data visualization web app required extensive web development knowledge. After Streamlit, it became as simple as:
import streamlit as st
st.line_chart(data)
We could bring this same efficiency to agent development with Phidata.
Concept
Imagine creating agents with this level of simplicity:
from phidata.archetypes import Researcher, Writer, Analyst
# Quick setup for common use cases
researcher = Researcher()
writer = Writer(style="technical")
# Deep customization when needed
custom_analyst = Analyst(
custom_prompts=my_prompts,
tools=[my_custom_tool],
workflow=my_workflow
)
Why Phidata
Phidata’s clean, straightforward approach makes it ideal for this enhancement:
- Maintains Phidata’s simplicity while adding powerful abstractions
- Reduces boilerplate for common agent patterns
- Allows developers to focus on unique agent characteristics
- Preserves full customization capabilities
Comparison with Visual Tools
While tools like Rivet offer accessible visual interfaces, they become limiting when facing:
- Deep customization requirements
- Integration with existing Python ecosystems
- Production-grade deployments
- Version control and CI/CD
- Complex business logic implementation
Phidata with archetypes would provide both rapid development and full framework capabilities.
Implementation
- Core Archetypes:
- Researcher (web search, data gathering)
- Writer (content generation)
- Analyst (data processing)
- QA (testing, validation)
- Planner (task decomposition)
- …
- Extension Pattern:
from phidata.archetypes import BaseArchetype
class MyCustomAgent(BaseArchetype):
def __init__(self, **kwargs):
super().__init__()
# Custom initialization